Dr. Jeff Masters' WunderBlog

New England flooding, air pollution, and the season's first typhoon
Posted by: Dr. Jeff Masters, 2:05 PM GMT op 15 mei 2006 +0
Major flooding has hit southern New Hampshire, southwest Maine, and northeast Massachussetts today, where more than 10 inches of rain has fallen in the past four days. The culprit is a "cut off low", a large low pressure system over the Great Lakes that got separated from the jet stream on Thursday, and has stayed almost stationary since since then, with no upper level winds to push it along. The counter-clockwise flow of air around the low has drawn copious amounts of moist oceanic air over New England. The rains from this moisture have brought the Warner river at Davisville and the Smith River at Bristol to flood stage this morning. With another 1-2 inches of rain expected across the region today, these rivers should crest several feet above flood stage, with moderate to major flooding. The cut-off low is expected to drift slowly northeastward today and get re-absorbed by the jet stream on Tuesday, which will finally bring an end to the worst of the rains. Howver, the weather pattern over the next week is expected to remain wet over the eastern half of the U.S., and more rain is expected in the Northeast later this week as the jet stream continues to remain in a typical Springtime active pattern.


Figure 1. Rainfall amounts for New England estimated by radar, ending at 8:30am EDT Monday May 15.

Air pollution season is here
May marks the beginning of air pollution season in the U.S., when summertime brings the hot temperatures, high amounts of UV radiation, and stagnant air that can trigger air pollution "Action Days". This week marks the annual observance of Air Pollution Awareness week, and at EPA's request, I will be writing several blogs highlighting air pollution. In particular, I'll discuss why one of NOAA's P-3 hurricane hunter airplanes will be in Texas for air pollution research this hurricane season, instead of flying hurricanes.

Quick intro on air pollution
Today, I'll present a quick summary of what pollutants we're concerned about. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) calculates the Air Quality Index (AQI) for five major air pollutants regulated by the Clean Air Act: ground-level ozone, particle pollution, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen dioxide. Ozone and particle pollution are the two most serious pollutants in the U.S. Particle pollution alone has been estimated to cause over 20,000 premature deaths the U.S. each year, and 800,000 worldwide (although the exact mortality numbers and definition of "premature deaths" is controversial).

Ozone is a colorless gas composed of three atoms of oxygen. Ozone forms both in the Earth's upper atmosphere and at the surface. Where ozone forms determines whether it is helpful or harmful to your health.

Good ozone naturally forms in the stratosphere, a layer of air about 10 - 30 miles (16 - 48 km) above Earth's
surface. This protective layer shields us from the sun's harmful ultraviolet rays. Without this layer, we would all be blinded and sunburned. Unfortunately, human-created chemicals are destroying this beneficial layer of ozone. Over the South Pole in springtime, the ozone loss is so severe that an "Ozone Hole" forms, letting significant amounts of harmful ultraviolet light reach the surface.

Ozone from the stratosphere sometimes gets transported to the surface, particularly in high mountainous regions. Hikers on Mt. Everest who don't use bottled oxygen can be at risk of death from breathing poisonous levels of ozone near the mountain's summit in some weather conditions.

Bad ozone forms near Earth's surface when the ultraviolet light in sunlight triggers a chemical reaction with "precursor pollutants" emitted by cars, power plants, and industrial sources. These precursor pollutants consist of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic hydrocarbons (VOC). Ozone near ground level is a harmful pollutant. Ozone pollution isn't limited to big cities like Los Angeles, Houston and New York. It's also found in smaller cities like Raleigh, NC and Cincinnati, OH. It can be a problem in rural areas, including some national parks. Ozone and the pollutants that react to form it (NOx and VOCs) can also be carried on the wind to affect air quality in urban and rural areas hundreds of miles away.

Particle pollution is a mixture of microscopic solids and liquid droplets suspended in air. This pollution, also known as particulate matter, is made up of a number of components, including acids (such as nitrates and sulfates), organic chemicals, metals, soil or dust particles, and allergens (such as fragments of pollen or mold spores). Unlike summertime ozone, particle pollution can occur year-round. It is worst in summer, though, when winds are lighter and the air becomes more stagnant.

Particles come in a wide range of sizes. Fine particles are less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter. How small is that? About 1/30th the diameter of the average human hair--so small, you'd need an electron microscope to see them.

Some fine particles can be emitted directly (think of smoke from a woodstove). But most are formed secondarily from complex atmospheric reactions of gases such as NOx and sulfur dioxide (SO2), that are emitted from power plants, industries, cars, buses and trucks. These fine particles are the worst for your health, since their small size allows then to penetrate deep into your lungs.

Inhalable coarse particles are larger than 2.5 and up to 10 micrometers in diameter. Sources of coarse particles include crushing or grinding operations and dust stirred up by vehicles traveling on roads. These particles are not as injurious to your health, as their large size allows them to be filtered out more readily by your nose before they reach your lungs.

Typhoon Chanchu
The season's first typhoon, a Category 4 storm with 140 mph winds named Chanchu, has turned north, and is now threatening to strike Hong Hong on Wednesday. Chanchu briefly made it to supertyphoon status on Sunday, when it had 150 mph sustained winds and a 910 mb central pressure. This was good enough for a Category 4 rating on the U.S. Saffir-Simpson scale, but not Category 5--which starts at 156 mph. A supertyphoon is defined as any tropical cyclone in the Western Pacific that attains maximum sustained winds of 150 mph. It is not unusual to get a supertyphoon in May, and this last happened in 2004, when Supertyphoon Nida reached Category 5 status with sustained winds of 160 mph. I'll have more on Typhoon Chanchu tomorrow.


Figure 2. Typhoon Chanchu at peak intensity Sunday, with 150 mph sustained winds and a 910 mb pressure.

Jeff Masters
Spicket River Rises (sabre1100)
Prime water front property for sale...at a barbain price no doubt
Spicket River Rises
York Beach flooding (SkyLazaria)
Mothers Day flooding in York Beach, Maine.
York Beach flooding
  Permalink | A A A
Reader Comments
Display: 0, 50, 100, 200 Sort: Newest First - Order Posted
Viewing: 251 - 301

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9Blog Index

251. louastu 9:32 PM GMT op 15 mei 2006    
Anyway, back to weather. Has any one looked at the Eastern Pacific system lately? It is looking pretty good on visible.

252. RL3AO 9:34 PM GMT op 15 mei 2006    
253. RL3AO 9:36 PM GMT op 15 mei 2006    
If you had something blowing you 55 mph, you might start spining too.
254. ForecasterColby 9:45 PM GMT op 15 mei 2006    
The EPAC system does look pretty good. No real surface wind rotation/low pressure, though.
255. louastu 9:59 PM GMT op 15 mei 2006    
Well, I will BBL, probably around 11:00 PM.
256. RL3AO 10:22 PM GMT op 15 mei 2006    
New sat image of the WPacific invest.

257. ForecasterColby 10:49 PM GMT op 15 mei 2006    
No one has commented on the wave tracker I mentioned above. *pokes*
258. Levi32 10:52 PM GMT op 15 mei 2006    
Sorry Colby I forgot about that. That is a great idea! A wave tracker would be extremely useful!
Member Since: 24 november 2005 Posts: 586 Comments: 25459
259. GPTGUY 11:23 PM GMT op 15 mei 2006    
Posted By: Alec at 6:52 PM GMT on May 15, 2006.
Posted By: STORMTOP at 6:47 PM GMT on May 15, 2006.
simple brains alex...

So, how would we know long range forecasts without models? Models are actually used in many other fields as well....I assume we should just dump them in the ocean too..lol...

No Alec we should just dump Stormtop in the ocean...then all would be well!!
Member Since: 26 augustus 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 391
260. louastu 11:29 PM GMT op 15 mei 2006    
I got a little break between chores, so I decided to check a few weather sites. I went to Accuweather.com, and found this.

Link

This is a map that highlights the areas that they believe are most at risk.

261. louastu 11:31 PM GMT op 15 mei 2006    
Oops. Let me try that again.

262. louastu 11:32 PM GMT op 15 mei 2006    
Hmm................. It won't let me post that image.

Oh well, it is on the link.
263. louastu 11:33 PM GMT op 15 mei 2006    
Anyway, break is over. I will be back around 11:00 PM.
265. FLCrackerGirl 11:37 PM GMT op 15 mei 2006    
Thumbs UP^^ On WaveTracker Colby!
Member Since: 12 augustus 2004 Posts: 47 Comments: 566
266. TheLuckyTacoBlizzard 11:55 PM GMT op 15 mei 2006    
any one her i have no one to talk to on my blog so far today so how is evere one doing today
267. TheSnowman 12:28 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
I Think It's Amazing that nobody ever implimented a Cat. 6 scale and what he has (176-205) is EXACTLY what it would be mathmaticly.....
Now there habve only been 7 Category 6's ever recorded in the Atlantic basin
and Last year we had 2 of them!!!!!
268. HurricaneMyles 12:36 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
I think the fact that there have only been 7 in history is self explanatory for why a Cat 6 isnt needed. Cat 5 damage is already described as catastophic, what will Cat 6 damage be described as...apocalyptic?
Member Since: 12 januari 2006 Posts: 5 Comments: 827
269. ForecasterColby 12:36 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
Category 5 is plenty. The difference between 160mph and 180mph really isn't that much, only 26% more force.
270. TheSnowman 12:38 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
It's just that it's soo hard for a storm just to get to 160mph so when they get up to 180 it's SOOOOO Rediculas they Deserve a higher rank because they are the King of Kings
271. Snowfire 12:39 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
Since the interval for Category 4 spans 24 mph (131-155), I would favor making category 5 156-179 and Category 6 180-204. If you really needed it, Category 7 could be defined as 205-234, but I have serious doubts about whether that will ever happen. By this reckoning, Rita, Wilma, and Monica would all make Category 6.
Member Since: 29 juni 2005 Posts: 24 Comments: 300
272. TheLuckyTacoBlizzard 12:42 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
hi : TheSnowman
273. franck 12:43 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
Hurricanemyles...no holocaustal.
Member Since: 30 augustus 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 1150
274. HurricaneMyles 12:43 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
It would work out fine, but it's just unnecessary, imo. The damage done by a Cat 6 will be roughly the same as a Cat 5, that is complete and utter destruction either way.
Member Since: 12 januari 2006 Posts: 5 Comments: 827
276. ForecasterColby 12:58 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
They 'deserve' the honor of Category 6? Why are we endowing storms with these honors? I enjoy a good, record-breaking hurricane as much as the next guy, but please don't tell me they 'deserve' it.
277. TheLuckyTacoBlizzard 12:59 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
278. GPTGUY 12:59 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
there is no reason for a cat 6 just like myles said cat 5 is catastrophic the saffir-simpson scale was made in the mid-late 70's at that point in time cat 5's were rare i know there is an upswing in cat 5's now but theres no need to revise the scale
Member Since: 26 augustus 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 391
279. GPTGUY 1:02 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
a hurricane doesnt deserve nothing as far as im concerned except maybe respect for the power they harness...thats it
Member Since: 26 augustus 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 391
280. turtlehurricane 1:03 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
i ahv updated my blog
Member Since: 22 juli 2005 Posts: 227 Comments: 466
283. TheLuckyTacoBlizzard 1:08 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
MichaelSTL they did 895
285. TheLuckyTacoBlizzard 1:11 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
MichaelSTL oh i see come see what the update maps color have today in my blog see you there
286. atmosweather 1:18 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
Well its really more than 1600 deaths, there are still over 3500 missing as of last week, and I don't think many of them are still alive.
Member Since: 24 september 2005 Posts: 33 Comments: 9255
287. TheLuckyTacoBlizzard 1:20 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
: atmosweather come to my blog
289. Levi32 2:03 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
Rich did you get my e-mail from earlier?
Member Since: 24 november 2005 Posts: 586 Comments: 25459
290. Avarhirion 2:07 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
What continues to boggle my mind about last year is not so much the number of storms, but how many formed and decided to go straight for land. Porportionately, fewer storms "spun out" than normal. Why? Was it the western position position of the bermuda high? Or something else?

TheLuckyTacoBlizzard's link spurred this comment, in case you're all wondering.
291. TheLuckyTacoBlizzard 2:11 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
Avarhirion hmm what link was that? how are you
292. atmosweather 2:14 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
Yes, the Bermuda High had a lot to do with it, but also, it was because a high proportion of storms formed in the western Atlantic or the Caribbean, which means that the storm has to hit land somewhere.
Member Since: 24 september 2005 Posts: 33 Comments: 9255
293. Levi32 2:18 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
Rich what do you think of our little wave nearing the Caribbean? I am impressed the convection keeps firing in places. I wonder if it will survive until the shear weakens.
Member Since: 24 november 2005 Posts: 586 Comments: 25459
294. franck 2:18 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
If you click on 'satellite' on the WU homepage map and animate it, it looks like the weather for nearly all the North American continent is setting up around the cutoff low over the Great Lakes. Super strange.
Member Since: 30 augustus 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 1150
295. TheLuckyTacoBlizzard 2:19 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
: atmosweather where is are Bermuda High and how far is it for the hurricane to hit the usa?
296. rxse7en 2:19 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/gfstc2.cgi?time=2006051518&field=Sea+Level+Pressure&hour=Animation

Is it worth noting that this run shows the lows creeping north towards the Cape? Once (if) those highs start clearing out of the Atlantic, Africa's gonna start spewing tropical waves at us again. :D

B
Member Since: 21 augustus 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 526
297. GPTGUY 2:21 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
of the 28 named storms last year 15 made landfall thats over half!!

TS Arlene-AL-FL Border
TS Bret-Mexico
Hurricane Cindy-Louisiana
Hurricane Dennis- Florida Panhandle
Hurricane Emily- Mexico twice
TS Gert- Mexico
TS Jose- Mexico
Hurricane Katrina- S. Florida/LA-MISS
Hurricane Rita- LA-TX Border
Hurricane Stan- Mexico
TS Tammy- NE Florida
Hurricane Vince- Spain (as a weakening TS)
Hurricane Wilma- Mexico/Florida
TS Alpha- Dominican Republic
Hurricane Beta- Nicaragua
Member Since: 26 augustus 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 391
298. Levi32 2:21 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
There is a monster wave over Africa in the bottom right corner of this image:

Member Since: 24 november 2005 Posts: 586 Comments: 25459
299. atmosweather 2:21 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
The wave still looks decent, and it is certainly not dissipating any time soon. I'm not sure if it can gain latitude fast enough to get into the favorable Caribbean though. If it does, we need to watch it. I'm gonna check the instability and the low level convergence forecasts for that area for 120 hours, then I'll be able to give a more accurate forecast on it.
Member Since: 24 september 2005 Posts: 33 Comments: 9255
300. atmosweather 2:23 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
Now THAT is the one that I talked about yesterday which IS worth watching.
Member Since: 24 september 2005 Posts: 33 Comments: 9255
301. Levi32 2:24 AM GMT op 16 mei 2006    
Rich where do you get instability and low level convergence forecasts? I don't know of any.
Member Since: 24 november 2005 Posts: 586 Comments: 25459

Viewing: 251 - 301

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9Blog Index

New Comment
Community Standards Policy Comments will take a few seconds to appear.
Post Your Comments
Please sign in to post comments.
Not only will you be able to leave comments on this blog, but you'll also have the ability to upload and share your photos in our Wunder Photos section.
About JeffMasters
Jeff co-founded the Weather Underground in 1995 while working on his Ph.D. He flew with the NOAA Hurricane Hunters from 1986-1990.

Community Activity